Anti-excepționalismul logic: o privire critică asupra argumentului abductiv

Dragoș Bigu critically examines logical anti-exceptionalism, the theory that logic is a revisable empirical science justified through abductive reasoning. While anti-exceptionalists like Graham Priest liken choosing logical systems to selecting scientific theories, Bigu—inspired by Mircea Dumitru—argues otherwise. He highlights that logical intuitions lack the objective consensus of empirical data and that logical systems remain normative even when assumptions change. Ultimately, logic’s a priori nature and normative role distinguish it from empirical disciplines. THIS ABSTRACT IS GENERATED WITH ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE.