JUSTICE OR MORALITY? A READER ON JOHN RAWLS’S CONCEPTION OF JUSTICE

Ovidiu CARAIANI; Onora O’NEILL; Thomas POGGE; Rex MARTIN; Catherine AUDARD; Peri ROBERTS

doi:10.48154/b11_26

JUSTICE OR MORALITY? A READER ON JOHN RAWLS’S CONCEPTION OF JUSTICE

Autori

Ovidiu CARAIANI; Onora O’NEILL (ed), ; Thomas POGGE; Rex MARTIN (ed), ; Catherine AUDARD (ed), ; Peri ROBERTS (ed),

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48154/b11_26

Cuvinte cheie:

justice, moral, politics

Rezumat

This volume was conceived as a possible answer to the question: Is justice as fairness a moral or a political ideal? The focus was on clarifying the method of A Theory of Justice and the main Rawlsian concepts (justice as fairness, political justice, justice in international relations, the two principles of justice and overlapping consensus), as well as their major criticisms, formulated by Nozick, Habermas, communitarians and feminists.
The present volume will be of interest for those studying political theory and philosophy, sociology and law.

Capitole

HOW FAIR IS JUSTICE AS FAIRNESS?

Ovidiu CARAIANI

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48154/b11_26/1
THE METHOD OF A THEORY OF JUSTICE

Onora O’NEILL

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48154/b11_26/2
THE POINT OF THE RAWLSIAN ENTERPRISE

Thomas POGGE

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48154/b11_26/3
FROM A THEORY OF JUSTICE TO POLITICAL LIBERALISM

Rex MARTIN

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48154/b11_26/4
STABILIZING DEMOCRACY: DOES RAWLS HAVE A CONCEPTION OF CITIZENSHIP?

Catherine AUDARD

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48154/b11_26/5
“SOMETHING WORTH DEFENDING”: RAWLS AND THE RIGHT TO SELF-DEFENSE IN THE LAW OF PEOPLES

Peri ROBERTS

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48154/b11_26/6

Referințe

Publicat

mai 26, 2026

Licență

TAceastă lucrare este licențiată în temeiul Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Cum cităm

JUSTICE OR MORALITY? A READER ON JOHN RAWLS’S CONCEPTION OF JUSTICE. (2026). Editura Universității din București. https://doi.org/10.48154/b11_26

Descărcați citarea